NPR's Liasson Inserts Inadvertent Irony Into Story on Bush (DODO*) Stump Speech
Mara Liasson's
piece on Mr. Bush (DODO*)'s stump speech brought back memories of college course in Restoration Drama that Pudentilla took many years ago.
In her piece, Ms. Liasson referred to Mr. Bush (DODO*)'s "plain spoken" style and then cut to a segment of Mr. Bush (DODO*)'s stump speech in which he asserted that he supported the dignity of every human life and that he supported marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman (paraphrase).
Now of course these assertions are not "plain-spoken;" they are coded. In asserting to a hand-picked crowd of religious conservatives (Liasson's description) that he supported the "dignity of every human life," Mr. Bush (DODO*) was actually saying: "I support the use of governmental power to prevent a woman from receiving an abortion." In asserting that he supported marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman, Mr. Bush (DODO*) was actually saying: "I support the use of governmental power to prevent the legal recognition and concommitant rights and responsibilities of gay relationships. [Alright, Pudentilla knows Mr. Bush (DODO*) couldn't and therefore wouldn't actually say "concommitant.]
Ms. Liasson does not note that these two assertions are at odds. If Mr. Bush truly recognized the dignity of every person, it would be difficult for him to object to gay marriage. He doesn't support the dignity of every person. He supports the use of governmental power to compel women to have children they do not want and to prevent gays from having legal recognition for their relationships. He is not "plain-speaking." He is, to the contrary, speaking a language his hand picked audience will understand, but that will not alarm the moderate, swing voters.
Mr. Bush (DODO*) is not the first to hypocritically cultivate a plain spoken style while actually believing and doing things far different from the things he says. William Wycherley wrote a wickedly funny satirical play based on such a character called "
The Plain Dealer." Pudentilla wishes that Ms. Liasson had read it. If she had, she would not have limited her comments on Mr. Bush (DODO*)'s style to his obvious dissembling:
"a rehearsed, polished and very consistent performance full of crowd-pleasing lines that help him cultivate an image of someone who says what he means and means what he says.
If Ms. Liasson knew of the precedent of the "Plain Dealer" she might well have considered reporting on what truths Mr. Bush (DODO*)'s image conceals. Ms. Liasson, accordingly, without realizing it, offers us another argument for a liberal arts education.
*DODO - Doesn't Obey Direct Orders